<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 8 Won&#8217;t be 128 bit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2009/10/windows-8-wont-be-128-bit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2009/10/windows-8-wont-be-128-bit/</link>
	<description>my opinions, conjectures, and thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:17:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Kroesbergen</title>
		<link>http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2009/10/windows-8-wont-be-128-bit/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Kroesbergen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kroesbergens.com/portfolio/?p=138#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Yes, it would, and did take a lot of work. What you might be unaware of however, is that Windows 7 supports it, as well as Mac OS X Snow Leopard. GPU/CPU parallel processing is here, and brings far more benefit than 128 bit will for the next 6 years. 
The other thing to note, is that IA-128 would actually refer to the Itanium server processing, not regular old x64... So while it may show up in server side computing in the next 6 years, it will not on the client side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it would, and did take a lot of work. What you might be unaware of however, is that Windows 7 supports it, as well as Mac OS X Snow Leopard. GPU/CPU parallel processing is here, and brings far more benefit than 128 bit will for the next 6 years.<br />
The other thing to note, is that IA-128 would actually refer to the Itanium server processing, not regular old x64&#8230; So while it may show up in server side computing in the next 6 years, it will not on the client side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2009/10/windows-8-wont-be-128-bit/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kroesbergens.com/portfolio/?p=138#comment-12</guid>
		<description>It would take quite a lot of improvement in the software technology to make use of video processors as if they were the main CPU--that would allow for some kind of 128-bit (if not 256-bit) computing. I wouldn&#039;t say it&#039;s impossible, but I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s where MS would want to put their effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would take quite a lot of improvement in the software technology to make use of video processors as if they were the main CPU&#8211;that would allow for some kind of 128-bit (if not 256-bit) computing. I wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s impossible, but I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s where MS would want to put their effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

