<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave Robots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2010/01/google-wave-robots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2010/01/google-wave-robots/</link>
	<description>my opinions, conjectures, and thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:17:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Kroesbergen</title>
		<link>http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2010/01/google-wave-robots/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Kroesbergen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2010/01/google-wave-robots/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Thank you Pamela. I agree that there are a variety of potential cases in which Wave robots may help out. However, until there are mobile applications which plugin to the API in a different manner, I don&#039;t believe that Wave robots will take off in the personal sector. I personally believe that for data retrieval purposes, a conversation robot will be less effective than an application designed to retrieve and present that data. 

Any hints as to potential API changes that will target this point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Pamela. I agree that there are a variety of potential cases in which Wave robots may help out. However, until there are mobile applications which plugin to the API in a different manner, I don&#8217;t believe that Wave robots will take off in the personal sector. I personally believe that for data retrieval purposes, a conversation robot will be less effective than an application designed to retrieve and present that data. </p>
<p>Any hints as to potential API changes that will target this point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2010/01/google-wave-robots/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2010/01/google-wave-robots/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>You are right that many of the compelling uses for robots are tied to business use - but there are in fact various uses of robots for casual use, like shopping or games. The withwaves.com crew has a few nice consumer-oriented robots that tie in with Amazon &amp; E-bay: http://withwaves.com/

Once we release some improvements to the robots API, you should start seeing more user-friendly robots that help out in a variety of situations. Stay tuned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right that many of the compelling uses for robots are tied to business use &#8211; but there are in fact various uses of robots for casual use, like shopping or games. The withwaves.com crew has a few nice consumer-oriented robots that tie in with Amazon &amp; E-bay: <a href="http://withwaves.com/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/withwaves.com/?referer=');">http://withwaves.com/</a></p>
<p>Once we release some improvements to the robots API, you should start seeing more user-friendly robots that help out in a variety of situations. Stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

