I could be wrong, but it looks like they’re enabling home WiFi streaming via Home Sharing in iOS 4.3 and iTunes. This is something I’m definitely excited about.

Watching some of the Engadget videos I must say the new device looks fast as hell. I didn’t think they could make iPad 1 look slow, but watching those videos I get the feeling that my iPad lacks some of the power and speed of the new ones, particularly in regards to real-time media editing in the Photo Booth application.

Speaking of movie editing, it looks like they’re really targeting home media production with this new device. Those new movie/audio apps, the HDMI out, and AirPlay turn iPad into a powerhouse for media generation.

I appreciate and agree with Steve’s comment near the end. “Our competitors are looking at this like it’s the next PC market. That is not the right approach to this. These are post-PC devices that need to be easier to use than a PC, more intuitive.” An important distinction in mentality I think. The PC market was for reasonably tech-savvy people, or people with reasonably tech-savvy relatives. The tablet/post-PC market is a new generation, one where anyone can pick one up and being computing. There’s no fear of technology, just something that stimulates curiosity.

Those are my thoughts for now. I won’t buy one now as the only benefit I get is the new form factor and Facetime communication. The speed is not something I need at this point since I don’t produce home movies or audio. However, while it’s not a jaw-dropping new product, it is definitely a quality upgrade to the product line.

Earlier this year my music collection started to seem a little stale, and I started to wish for more variety, more music I have not listened to. This lead me to consider a VPN, which would essentially tunnel my Internet connection to a server in the US, allowing me to access Pandora and other sites such as Hulu ⁴. I considered paying for a subscription to a VPN, but was having difficulty finding one that was reasonably priced and would tunnel my connection properly (all my data needs to flow through the US IP, not just a HTTP proxy). The other requirement was that the VPN be accessible via my iPad and iPhone as well as my desktop computers (Windows and Mac), and the only type of VPN connection that seemed to adequately satisfy my needs was an L2TP/IPSec VPN.

Since I couldn’t find a VPN service that seemed to satisfy my needs, I decided to create my own, which means I need root access to a server. I also plan to tunnel a lot of data, considering I will primarily be using it for media streaming. I also didn’t want to pay Windows Server licensing fees, so decided to take the route of Ubuntu Server. OpenVPN does not do native L2TP/IPSec, so was out of the question considering my iPad/iPhone requirement. This left StrongSwan and FreeSwan as the potential VPN platforms.

I started looking at LowEndBox ⁵ for cheap Virtual Private Servers (VPS) that came with copious amounts of data. I don’t need much processing power… just a lot of bandwidth. Initially I thought I found a great service for $5/mo… an OpenVZ based VPS with unlimited data. I purchased a couple months worth, and began setting up an Ubuntu 10.10 server, using the guide at ByBacon.com ⁶.

It was then that I hit a major stumbling block. Every time that I attempted to initiate a connection with the VPS from any one of my clients, the server would fail to respond. Checking the server logs, I didn’t see any record of either PPP connections or IPSec initiations. Obviously there was an issue with the NIC interface.

On investigation, I found that OpenVZ creates virtual, emulated ethernet devices, using the name VENET, with no MAC address. IPSec VPN service I was attempting to use requires root-level access to the device itself, as well as an accessible MAC address. Now, this can be accomplished using a TUN/TAP device… but requires some not-so-simple changes by the OpenVZ administrator. I put in a ticket to have one created, but unfortunately the service I’d paid for happens to not support creating these devices for clients.

So… I needed to find a different service… either Xen-based or VMware-based. Eventually I found a service from ENScloud ⁷ that seems to work well, and provide me with copious amounts of bandwidth. It took about a week for them to provision my server and IP, but after the initial hiccup everything seems to function well (their support guy Brandon was more than helpful after I put in a ticket requesting update). I’ve been listening to Pandora a lot since the VPN was created.

I eventually plan to rent out access to my VPN to family and friends, as I want to recoup my costs, so I figure that if I can rent out access for $5/yr if I get 12-15 people interested. I’ve managed to get it working easily under Windows (certificate-based), Mac, iPad, and iPhone, so no matter what platform family and friends are using, it will be accessible to them. I would eventually like to get a WebDAV service running as part of the service, so those with iWork for iOS can use it for cloud document storage.

Fortunately the Spirit jailbreak² tool was released just after the launch of the 3G iPad this past weekend. The Spirit jailbreak uses a common exploit to the iPad and iPhone to jailbreak, and consequently, I was able to jailbreak my iPhone 3GS running the latest firmware/baseband. I installed MyWi³ a tethering application that goes beyond Apple’s Bluetooth/USB tethering to provide tethering via WiFi, similar to the Verizon MiFi. I set up a WiFi network and password protected it. Thanks to the iPad’s network memory feature, every time I launch MyWi, it starts the protected network, and the iPad automatically connects. Smooth and seamless.

The only problem I’ve had with this setup is the bandwidth usage. In 40 minutes I used up 33Mb down and 6.5 up. This was just doing basic web browsing, email, and a speed test. I don’t know how tenable this usage is on my 6GB/mo plan.

Here’s a screenshot of my bandwidth up and down in Toronto on Rogers 3G network.

I refused to write a review on the iPad in the first week. In my mind, the iPad is a paradigm shifting technology. Until I’d used the iPad for a few weeks, I did not feel I could provide the perspective I feel is important to my readers. Reviewing a new device is like a relationship. All fuzzy feelings for the first little while, then reality hits. I wanted to write a review that was not affected by initial emotions or excitement.

So, without further ado, let me tell you my experience with the iPad.

Battery life. This thing is phenomenal. I have never had another electronic device that did not make me nervous toward the end of a day of use. Even my iPhone 3GS does not provide me with the same sense of security that the device will not die by the end of a day of use. I can even charge the iPad Friday morning, take it up north (always careful with how I use it when away from a charger), and still have 40% battery left. I completely trust the iPad to be charged when I need it.

Convenience. Portability. The iPad has changed the frequency with which I take my computer with me. I rarely take my MacBook Pro from home anymore. I take the iPad everywhere. It’s like carrying a notebook with me, weight-wise. I pick it up off the desk and carry it in my hand. I don’t need a backpack to take my computer with me. This has changed my perspective on using my personal commuting device. It has become a permanent companion, rather than a tool to be utilized when needed. Similar to my iPhone.

I have begun to reevaluate my need for the MacBook Pro. All my data is stored on my Ubuntu mediaserver (hosted on VMware ESXi along with my Windows VM’s). I now utilize the iMac for managing my virtual servers and ESXi. I have Air Video Server installed for streaming movies from the media server to the iPad, and FileBrowser installed for browsing the network files from the iPad. The only real need that I have for the laptop is for import of my photos from my Nikon D40. I’ve begun to question whether I really need the laptop solely for immediate import of my photos. My Aperture 3 library is synced across my backup server, iMac, and laptop. I’ve begun to think that as long as I can wait to import my photos from a weekend out of the city till I get back home, I have no justifiable need for my laptop. I will be continuing to evaluate this over the next month or so, but I’m afraid that the laptop will be going. Never thought I’d say this.

I can extoll the various features of the iPad. However, I feel enough other reviews have done that. This piece is about how the iPad has changed the way I’m using technology. The next posts that I write will likely be shaped from an iPad user’s experience.

What is Flash used for? In my experience, Flash is generally used for the following:

• Ads
• Games
• Music Players
• Movie Players
• Photo Galleries

Lets look at each one of these categories in a bit more detail.

Ads: Those annoying, flashy (excuse the pun) banners you see on some of the riff-raff sites of the internet. The big, ugly, strong-coloured patches in the websites you visit… generally are Flash. Very few people appreciate Flash ads. As a matter of fact, they were one of the leading instigators in the ad-blocking plugin market.

Games: This I believe is the only category that truly justifies the ‘interactive’ benefit that Flash provides. There is nothing else that remotely comes close to the power of Flash interactivity for web interface games. However, I have a problem with the category. It is generally either children or reclusive adults that tend to play Flash games. The majority of the adult population use the web for information consumption. The majority of children/teenagers will use a dedicated gaming device. I also think that as the iTunes App Store market matures in the gaming category, the majority of users will find much more value in natively coded games.

Music Streaming Another category that Flash is very prevalent in usage. Sites like MySpace, Last.fm, and others tend to use a Flash player by default. The reason for this is that Flash tends to be a very quick, easy to implement solution for music playback and playlist generation. There is nothing else available right now that offers the webmaster anything nearly as easy to implement. Until HTML5 becomes a bit more prevalent, Flash will be used de facto for music playback in the browser. Fortunately for us iPhone/iPod Touch/iPad users, some of these sites have published API’s, and some have their own dedicated app in the iTunes App Store (e.g., Last.fm). Also, the majority of iPod Touch/iPhone/iPad users will have iTunes syncing their music to their device.

Movie Players I would argue that this category would come close to Music Streaming in prevalence of Flash implementation. Unfortunately for Adobe, HTML5 offers a native implementation for movie streaming, via the ‘video’ tag. As HTML5 browsers become more prevalent, and sites like YouTube switch to either a single HTML5 portal, or a dual HTML5/Flash service, Adobe will have a harder time justifying the need for Flash in the Movie Player category.

Photo Galleries As an amateur photographer, I’ve found that the many self-hosted photo gallery solutions for servers are Flash based. However, this is again generally due to laziness on the part of programmers, or because there are a lot of easy, of-the-shelf solutions for the photographers with little computer knowledge. There are many native web coded galleries that work just as well, and are not hard to implement. Unfortunately, the majority of photographers do not have much of a budget for displaying their photos on the web, and generally hire a low-cost (usually inexperienced) web developer to build a photo site for them. There’s no technical justification for using Flash to display a gallery of photos.

Over the next few years, as HTML5 capable browsers become more ubiquitous, and providers start providing dual-service HTML5/Flash streaming, the need for Flash Movie Players will become miniscule. Thanks to the iTunes App Store, the desire for Flash games is swiftly disappearing. As applications like Lightroom and Aperture continue integrating web-publishing, photographers using professional tools for their photos will have less and less need to hire a third-party, inexperience web developer for Photo Galleries. In the end, the only justification for a webmaster to use Adobe Flash is for publishing Ads, and using it as an easy-to-implement Music Streaming player.

The article makes a number of interesting observations, particularly about hardware manufacturers and suppliers. It also makes mention of a number of upcoming hardware designs and the features they will bring. I’d recommend reading the piece, even if just for the factual knowledge it contains.

I’m afraid however, that I have to disagree with the author. In my opinion, I don’t believe that 2010 is the year of the Linux tablet. As a matter of fact, I don’t think that any Linux device will ever out-iPad the iPad. Linux aficionados have been proclaiming the ‘year of Linux’ on desktops for as far back as I can remember. Every year, every distribution, Linux fans rejoice and proclaim that the end is nigh for Microsoft and Apple domination, and that Linux is going to take over the world. Why? Because they believe that ‘free’ will triumph over commercial.

The author summarizes my perspective exactly (though completely unintended) in a later paragraph, where he says ‘In my opinion, Linux won’t offer this kind of magic. To bring magic like Apple does, Linux and the companies bringing Linux have to act like Apple. That means secrecy, a closed development model, a one-size-fits-all solution and one and only one manufacturer / organization which oversees hardware, software, marketing and the developer community. Not going to happen for free software and Linux!’ If we break down this statement meaningfully, we see that that in order to bring an almost perfect user experience, one needs to have a closed development model, and a single manufacturer designing both the hardware AND software. He continually pushes Android, an flavor of Linux being driven by a company (Google) with a lot of money behind it, and a development structure (management) that is not available in a community driven environment.

The author highlights another perspective I share (again, unintentionally I’m sure), when he states that ‘Android is much more popular, and the magic comes from Google, Google marketing Android at big device manufacturers and the platform being ‘pretty open’. Also, in contrary to my limited view, Google understood the issue about marketing and education. That’s why, in advent of the ballot screen, they ran huge adds outside on busstops, along highways and buildings at least in NL and UK and they even bought their own front page add on free newspapers read by millions of Dutch readers.’ It’s funny how advertising is so important even for something free. He realizes that the idealistic nature of Linux (free) is not merely enough to make people want it. Money (and lots of it) must be spent in order for something to be adopted. Nothing in life is free, and unfortunately, the majority of the Linux community seem to miss that fact.

The author concludes with a short(sighted) paragraph, stating that ‘Android on the tablet will be what Windows was on the desktop. But it will be easier for other Linux to co-exist with Android than with Windows, so for those who like to tinker the feature is pretty bright.’ But I thought that Linux by its very nature was supposed to be open, so that it can coexist easily with everything? Therefore, it shouldn’t be easier to code for Linux rather than Windows. Unfortunately, developers tend to code more for the platforms that make them money (but hey, everything in life should be free right? ), and the majority of developers will tend to code for the Windows desktop OS. Also, I think it is very short-sighted to conclude that Microsoft will not be targeting the tablet market as well.

This post may come across a little bit harsh toward Linux. However, the fact remains that without proper guidance/direction in the development of a Linux tablet OS, and proper marketing, Linux will never succeed. For this ‘free’ operating system to succeed, money, and lots of it, must be spent. The only problem is that it is not the general Linux community who will pay for it. Rather, it will be (is) big corporations (see Google) who fork out tons of money. It just seems that the Linux community does not get this fact, or, if they do, do not care about freeloading the money to support their dream of a ‘free’ OS.

Microsoft obviously is not going to take the iPad challenge lying down, and will be touting Windows 7 as a more complete experience (Flash anyone?) than the iPad OS. Unfortunately however, I don’t see Windows 7, good as it may be, to be a worthwhile competitor to the iPad, due to the reason outlined above. So what should Microsoft do?

I firmly believe that if Microsoft wants to take on the iPad, it needs to build a tablet from the ground up. They’ve got some great software and hardware engineers¹, and should leverage that talent to build a complete Microsoft tablet experience. Integrate it with Zune and Xbox. They’ve got the Zune app store and Xbox download on demand. Utilize the existing frameworks and build a custom, performance tuned device that can compete with the iPad. Microsoft has proven it has both the hardware and software talent… now they need to be combined.

First, in response to John Nack, who makes the point that Flash has brought standardization to the web. Yes, while it did bring a standard to the web for a while, once Adobe purchased Macromedia, Flash itself started fragmenting into many different versions which supported different levels of features. This resulted in many users having to upgrade their Flash plugins depending on the site visited. How is this any better a ‘standard’ than HTML5? Might as well force the user to upgrade their browser to a standards-compliant version.
So, Flash provides ubiquitous browser video playback? Who cares? YouTube and Vimeo are switching to HTML5, Hulu is committed to providing iPad compliant service, and everyone else doesn’t care what they use to play video in their browser. As Internet Explorer 8 begins mass penetration (via Windows 7) and Internet Explorer 6 support is dropped (as Google announced yesterday), Flash will become less & less important. Lets be honest here. The only reason Flash is really needed is IE6′s existence. Everything else can and should be implemented via HTML5 and standards-compliant services such as OpenType.
John Nack concludes with a point that the Flash team will likely be using the GPU to bring fast performance to the desktop plugin. Who cares? The iPad and iPhone are mobile devices. Utilizing a separate GPU to do the processing is irrelevant on a mobile device that uses System-on-a-Chip design.
He also makes the point that the download size for QuickTime is twice that of Flash. Irrelevant. Most of the Flash-haters he is targeting with this post (and most Adobe CS users) are running a Mac, with native support. And most people with iTunes installed (read: everyone with an iPod/iPhone) have QuickTime installed as part of Apple Software Update. So no, ubiquity is not dependent on the download size of your plugin.

Second, in response to The Flash Blog. Have of the sites you illustrated have an iPhone compliant version (as pointed out by Mark Hughes here), and likely more will by the time iPad launches. Other sites have worthwhile iPhone app alternatives. Why should I use your plugin if the iPad supports native HTML5, and the majority of video media is capable of being delivered to me that way (YouTube, Vimeo, and Hulu?) I don’t want to play Flash web games, and with the iPhone/iPod Touch/iPad, most games that people will be playing will be native iPhone apps anyway. So there is no use for Flash for media playback or gaming on iPhone OS. What does Flash offer me then?
Your Flash plugin performance sucks. Small wonder Apple didn’t want didn’t want a battery pig like that on the iPhone and iPad.

Flash is dead. I hate the platform with a passion, and while I’d love to watch it die a long and slow death, the faster it goes the better. With Google’s latest announcement that they will stop supporting IE6, HTML5 ubiquity will hopefully begin. Flash is useless if my content is delivered to me through other streams, whether the iTunes store, HTML5, or a dedicated app. If I want an ‘interactive’ game, I’ll stick with a native iPhone or iPad application. There is nothing that Flash offers me, and no real way for it to ‘innovate’ against the march of technological progress. Welcome to the New World folks.

While some may view the lack of multi-tasking on the iPad to be a drawback, I for one view it as a plus. Since I will be using it primarily as a means of reading content (whether web, eBook, or eMagazine), I do not want distractions from other apps. Everytime I get a Growl notification on my MacBook Pro, I switch focus. No multi-tasking = less distraction.

I am disappointed by the lack of security measures on the iPad. I tend to lean toward paranoia when it comes to electronic security (one of the pluses of working in the government/health/financial sector), and do not want my data being accessible to someone else at the mere swipe of a finger. I will not be using this for any work purposes until there is a better authentication mechanism.

I’m also disappointed with the lack of a webcam. A webcam would truly complete the home user experience of this device. However, Apple has seen fit to save that for another revision, so we must suffer sans video for the time being.

Overall I’m very pleased with the device. I love the way Steve Jobs positioned it as a market all to itself. It’s not intended to replace the PCs/Macs, and it’s not designed to replace the iPhone/iPod Touch. It is truly an intermediate device, one which may become the primary computing mechanism for neophytes. As someone else pointed out, non-technical people will pick this device up and not even realize that what they are doing is considered computing.

I don’t suspect we’ll see any remotely capable competition for quite sometime, at which point Apple will have improved the device again. As John Gruber pointed out, the custom designed chip has enabled Apple to put the performance of the device far ahead of any competing silicon. And since the chip is Apple’s, competitors will have to wait for Intel or another manufacturer to produce a truly competitive CPU. I’d guess Intel is none too happy with Apple at this point.