<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wes Kroesbergen&#039;s Portfolio &#187; Windows 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/tag/windows-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio</link>
	<description>my opinions, conjectures, and thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:13:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 8 Won&#8217;t be 128 bit</title>
		<link>http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2009/10/windows-8-wont-be-128-bit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2009/10/windows-8-wont-be-128-bit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wes Kroesbergen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IA-128]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IA-64]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x64]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kroesbergens.com/portfolio/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been a number of &#8216;unconfirmed&#8217; rumours floating around in the last few days about Windows 8 being 128 bit. While certainly an exciting thought, the likelihood of it being true is almost nil. Windows 8 being 128 compatible is like Windows XP Professional x64 being 64 bit. While it &#8216;worked&#8217; to an extent, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been a number of &#8216;unconfirmed&#8217; rumours floating around in the last few days about Windows 8 being 128 bit. While certainly an exciting thought, the likelihood of it being true is almost nil. Windows 8 being 128 compatible is like Windows XP Professional x64 being 64 bit. While it &#8216;worked&#8217; to an extent, there was almost no market at the time, and the implementation was extremely buggy, to say the least. It was a half-assed attempt to say that Windows XP was 64 bit compatible.</p>
<p>There are no 128 bit capable processors available. Microsoft is building for a market that hasn&#8217;t even started yet. They&#8217;ve barely transitioned to 64 bit! Windows 7 is the first Windows OS that has a truly viable 64 bit market. Manufacturers have had a few years to develop 64 bit drivers, and consequently, it is far more likely that you can install Windows 7 x64 now than you could install Windows XP x64. Add to that that almost every new computer ships with a 64 bit processor, and you have yourself one viable market. Software developers also now have mature SDK&#8217;s, and have had a few years to transition to 64 bit computing. </p>
<p>Microsoft has finally shipped Windows 7, with a much shorter timeframe than Windows Vista did. I suspect that they are going to try to maintain such an active pace, shipping software every 18-24 months or so, rather than the 5 years it took for Vista. There is no way that either the hardware market or the software market will be remotely ready for 128 bit computing in 2 years. Yes, they may make it &#8216;functional&#8217;, like XP x64 was &#8216;functional&#8217;, but it will not truly be 128 bit. I suspect that Windows 9 will be as 128 bit mature as Windows Vista was 64 bit mature. Don&#8217;t expect true 128 bit computing till Windows 10. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kroesbergens.com/portfolio/2009/10/windows-8-wont-be-128-bit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

